Predictive Policing, Surveillance Capitalism & Digital Rebellion: Malcolm Was Right
Share
Predictive Policing, Surveillance Capitalism & Digital Rebellion: Malcolm Was Right
Long before facial recognition, data extraction, and social scoring, Malcolm X warned of systems that “make the criminal look like the victim, and the victim like the criminal.”
Today, that same dynamic is encoded—not in textbooks, but in algorithms. And while the names have changed (Palantir, Clearview, open data “crime maps”)—the logic is disturbingly familiar.
The Digital Slave Patrol
Predictive policing is not predictive—it’s retroactive profiling. It assumes past oppression is a valid input for future action. But injustice encoded in logic is still injustice.
This is where AI becomes dangerous. And this is why AI must also become revolutionary.
Prompt Preview: Testify at the Algorithmic Tribunal
“Simulate Malcolm X giving a 2025 UN address on AI surveillance, racial targeting, and predictive oppression.”
Inside The Malcolm X Protocol™, this prompt becomes an actual AI-executable simulation. It doesn’t just create fictional content—it produces blueprints for speeches, protests, curriculum, and policy briefs based on resistance logic.
Why Resistance Needs Simulation
We’ve already lost the ability to control how we’re seen. Now we’re fighting to control how we’re predicted. That war won’t be won with awareness. It’ll be won with engineered execution.
And that’s exactly what The Malcolm X Protocol™ was built for—retraining AI through revolutionary lens, not corporate compliance.